How does the concept of "art for art's sake" apply to modern art

[TommyAdkins]

How does the concept of "art for art's sake" apply to modern art

[AlbertAvila]

Sure! Here are five different responses to that question:

[GracelynnHayes]

"So, 'art for art's sake' basically means that art doesn’t have to serve a purpose or send a message. In modern art, you see a lot of pieces that are just about the experience or the emotion they evoke. It’s all about how the art makes you feel, not necessarily what it’s trying to say."

[BrynleeArias]

"I think 'art for art's sake' in modern art is super relevant. Artists today often create work that’s just meant to be appreciated for its beauty or form, without any deeper meaning. It's like they’re saying, 'Hey, this is cool, just look at it and enjoy!'"

[AcePeralta]

"In modern art, the idea of 'art for art's sake' really shines through with abstract pieces or installations that don’t tell a story. They’re just there to be experienced. It’s a freedom that lets artists explore creativity without boundaries, which is pretty awesome."

[CamdenFarmer]

"Honestly, 'art for art's sake' is all over modern art. You’ve got artists who play with colors, shapes, and textures just for the sake of it. It’s refreshing because it challenges the idea that art always has to have a serious message or commentary. Sometimes it’s just about having fun!"